Facts, fracks and community action

Facts, fracks and community action

Last updated 10:02 29/05/2012

Reuben Hunt likens New Zealand’s nascent anti-fracking movement to the anti-nuclear movement of the 1980s.

Public awareness of fracking has come a long way since I wrote about it in The Press last year (“Don’t believe scare stories about fracking; it’s far worse”, September 13).

But I am confused. On the one hand, our Government, which is supposed to protect us and the future of New Zealand, assures us fracking is OK. On the other hand, at grassroots level, campaigning against fracking is gathering momentum, spreading like wildfire. So who does one believe?

That is a difficult one, so I decided to look at the issue from a totally different angle.

There is one fact that stands out from all others. It cannot be denied by either camp. It is also a reason why fracking should never take place on New Zealand soil, or at sea.

For this line of thought, the only relevant facts you need to know are that fracking involves boring down into the earth and then lining the borehole, usually with concrete. Toxic chemicals are pumped down the hole, along with sand and an average of 11 million litres of clean water per frack.

While some waste water returns to the surface, most of the toxic mix stays underground and is left there when the well is no longer productive and is capped for good.

In Canterbury there are nearly 27,500 water bores or wells. Of these, Environment Canterbury (ECan) monitors the water level of 161. About 15 of these, or 9 per cent, were put out of action by the earthquakes. Extrapolate that across the total of 27,500 and you get 2500 water bores or wells in Canterbury incapacitated over the past 18 months.

Fortunately, fracking is relatively new to New Zealand, with Taranaki experimenting with about 50 frack bores in the past 10 years, and not 20 or 30 years, as those in favour of fracking would like us to believe. But if our Government has its way, there may be thousands of frack bores across Canterbury and New Zealand in the next few decades.

When there is another major earthquake, a significant number of these will fracture and break and let toxic frack water into our aquifers. The risk is there even from the 150,000 earthquakes in New Zealand every year that are of magnitude 2.3 and above.

Once the bores are drilled, they will stay there forever, so it is not a matter of if, but when our drinking and irrigation water will be fouled – for good. Then we will have to drink bottled water, and I am not sure what farmers will use to irrigate and make dairy products with.

More here

Claims of water poisoning and sickness Taranaki

Fracking: The Deeper You Dig, The Darker It Gets

http://www.massivemagazine.org.nz/blog/2012/03/19/fracking-the-deeper-you-dig-the-darker-it-gets/

By Jamie Christian Desplaces

 

The water that flows down from Mount Taranaki and through the pristine dairy country that surrounds the tiny settlement of Kapuni is not fit for human consumption. But it’s nothing to do with what’s on the land.  It’s what’s happening below it, and it has locals afraid for their health.

Locals say the Kapuni Stream is contaminated and they are blaming the toxic poisons being used by oil companies in an extraction method that has drawn criticism around the world – hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, a process in which liquids laced with chemicals are pumped into the ground at high pressure to force oil to the surface (see diagram ).

They talk about the polluted stream and contaminated ground water and point to a curious cluster of cancer cases. Even the Taranaki District Health Board admits that the death rate from cancer in the province is significantly higher than in the rest of New Zealand.

Secondary school teacher Sarah Roberts says the groundwater in the paddocks around Kapuni which are dotted with oil and gas production platforms, is not safe. She blames it on poisonous water leaching from unlined pits where it is stored after being used in fracking.

“The groundwater is not safe for drinking, stock use, or irrigation, and is right beside the Kapuni Stream. The groundwater at Kapuni it’s not safe to drink.”

It is also known that diesel has been used by oil companies to help them extract oil from the ground, and that diesel contains a toxic mixture of benzene, toluene, ethuylenzene, and xylenes, which can have serious degenerative effects on the human central nervous system.

Sarah Roberts tells the story of a woman in Kapuni who wanted to talk to her.

“I went over and she told me that her family is sick. They have kids with tumours, the woman has MS. I told her one of the worst pits is right next to her and she agreed and said that she was sure all of the pits were contaminated. She said it’s like the Ivon Watkins Dow where all they got after all the years of leukaemia was free health care. She said she doesn’t want to go through all of that, through all of the publicity and scrutiny. She told me that the best advice that she could give was to sell my farm, go live by the beach and forget about it.”

Sarah, who locals have dubbed the Erin Brockovich of Taranaki, is far from alone in her fears.

South Taranaki District Councillor Michael Self has a personal cancer story to tell.

“My mother sang for the Kapuni choir. Half the choir over the last few years have died of cancers. My mother was one of those. They all drank in the area. Over the past five or six years they were just popping off. You start driving down the road past the Kapuni gasworks and you look at the houses and you can reel off the people that have died in recent years.”
Oil companies admit they have previously dumped the fluid used in fracking into unlined earth pits, often without resource consent, and one company admits there are 10 contaminated sites at Kapuni and that the water under them is not fit for stock or irrigation.

Of course no one can prove these illnesses are a result of the fluids used in fracking. The oil industry maintains that hydraulic fracturing is safe.

But locals say they are not so sure, and ask where the Taranaki Regional Council is in all this …

+++

“It’s reasonably clear that these … earthquakes are being caused by the disposal-well activities.” – Art McGarr, US Geological Survey

Fracking has become notorious around the globe, rousing environmentalists into a foam-mouthed frenzy and exasperating oil and gas executives in equal measures. For every claim, there’s a counter claim, for every accusation, there’s a defence, in what has become a tit-for-tat merry-go-round of classic mud-slinging. The infamous American Gasland documentary of 2010, an exposé of the usual so-called corporate half-truths, lies, and cover-ups, simply added fuel to the already raging oil-field-like fires.

Fracking has been banned in France and Bulgaria and there are moratoriums in place in New South Wales, Quebec, South Africa and some US states. There is protest in parts of Europe and in some corners of the UK especially, with recent revelations that the practice was the cause of minor seismic tremors last year.

Fracking has been going on in the US for around 60 years, and 90 percent of their natural gas wells now use the process. There have been major concerns over air pollution and the contamination of groundwater, and in turn drinking water that, some say, is having a detrimental effect on the health of those who live in proximity to the gas wells. There have been examples of residents holding lighters to running taps causing the water to ignite, and the Environmental Protection Agency has discovered traces of contaminants in water wells across the country.

A New York Times report last year found a number of waste-water wells to be radioactive, and a House of Representatives study of the same year claimed that of 750 compounds used, 680 contained possible carcinogens

Hydro geologic Risk Assessment of Hydraulic Fracturing for Gas Recovery in the Taranaki Region

Hydro geologic Risk Assessment of Hydraulic Fracturing for Gas Recovery in the Taranaki Region

While browsing this Risk Assessment please note disclaimer provided on page two – the data was provided by the Oil and Gas Companies. They then go on to claim no liability. Hmmm, sounds ominous?

Click to access TRC%20Fracking-report-feb2012.pdf

What will you find here?

What is fracking and should it be banned?

To frack an oil or gas well, a massive volume of water, sand, and chemicals is injected underground at high pressure to break up rock formations, allowing oil or gas to flow up the well.  Fracking threatens the air we breathe, the water we drink, the communities we love and the climate on which we depend.

What happens if we get these serious decisions wrong?

Our coastlines are now surrounded with a cloud bank or fog.  It has been some time since we have seen a real horizon and much activity has been taking place in this cloud matter including use of frequency technology. The oil and mineral exploration technologies are already impacting New Zealanders, the environment and the marine wild life.

This site will address the negative impacts of Fracking and Sea Bed Mining as pertains to Aoteoroa.

Fracking Whatatutu

  • Is it safe?
  • How many litres of water are used to extract each barrel?
  • What are the chemicals they use?
  • How safe are they?
  • The chemicals are secret?  Why?
  • Do the chemical leech into ground water?
  • Who says they can divert our fresh water for fracking?
  • What happens to the used fracking fluids?
  • Aren’t we clean and green?
  • Why is oil part of our growth agenda?
  • Is the government changing the Minerals Act to benefit industry?
  • How does this affect our Treaty of Waitangi
  • Is there any real benefit for our community?
  • How many local jobs will be created and what kind of jobs?
  • Where do the profits go and are they worth the environmental impact?
  • What if something goes wrong?
  • Who really benefits?
  • What’s the company’s reputation overseas?
  • Who pays if they destroy our water?
  • Are there any alternatives?
  • How about Green Energy?
  • How can the Crown sell the minerals from beneath our farm?
  • We only own the topsoil? Who knew?
  • France South Africa, Bulgeria all banned fracking. Why?
  • What about our children, tamariki, whanau?
  • What are we going to leave behind to the 7th generation as a result of what could happen here?

What happens if we get these very serious decisions wrong?